Supercharger MOD

Law_ · Post by **Law_** » Sat Oct 10, 2009 3:47 pm

Hi everyone... i would like to discuss the possiblity of install a Supercharger like a Roots (from a Cooper S) or from a G40 Vw Polo. I would be available to try this in my car if it shows itself reliable and a good option. Please comment. Cheers

Slavixs · Post by **Slavixs** » Mon Oct 12, 2009 9:59 pm

You need like this on D series...

and drive is from the conditioning pulley...

One my known man (from hondaclub.lv forum) puted that charger on D16!

here some videos...
http://s352.photobucket.com/albums/r340 ... epiens.flv
http://s352.photobucket.com/albums/r340 ... EO0006.flv

Law_ · Post by **Law_** » Tue Oct 13, 2009 3:01 am

Thank you very much for the info ! I want that so much !

Brutal acceleration, it is the greatest mod of all hehe. Please people comment and lets discuss this ! Slavixs, if you can, please translate us some feedback from his experience in the Charger. Thank you. Cheers

Slavixs · Post by **Slavixs** » Tue Oct 13, 2009 9:30 am

http://www.hondaclub.lv/forums/viewtopi ... =7&t=14906

here is likt to his topic, with google translater you can translate (ps language there is latvian)

take and translate all page traugh google. I hope thats will help!

here is the some dyno results with charger on D16Y8

Law_ · Post by **Law_** » Tue Oct 13, 2009 12:58 pm

Slavixs wrote:http://www.hondaclub.lv/forums/viewtopi ... =7&t=14906

here is likt to his topic, with google translater you can translate (ps language there is latvian)
take and translate all page traugh google. I hope thats will help!

here is the some dyno results with charger on D16Y8

Thank you ! did i understood right? 130kw? Cheers

mynameisowen · Post by **mynameisowen** » Tue Oct 13, 2009 3:14 pm

sounds good, but i think a turbo would be easier just because there is more support for it. Doesnt mean you shouldnt do it thought, it would be very interesting

Post by **saxophonias** » Tue Oct 13, 2009 5:05 pm

I think that a compressor to a low displacement engine wouldn't have the same amount of power gains as bigger engines would, due to the fact that the compressor takes its power from the crank.

mynameisowen · Post by **mynameisowen** » Tue Oct 13, 2009 6:34 pm

True it is suited to larger displacement, but if your not looking for crazy power then it would be okay, like under 180hp

Law_ · Post by **Law_** » Tue Oct 13, 2009 8:11 pm

My goal is like 130 whp wich gives almost 150hp at the engine assuming 15% dissipated power. I guess the charger would be ok for that kind of power. i got to study the charger mechanism better, and the possibility of doing a mini-me mod at the same time. The compression increase of the mini-me wouldnt be catastrofic with the force induction of the charger?Cheers

Law_ · Post by **Law_** » Tue Oct 13, 2009 8:14 pm

mynameisowen wrote:sounds good, but i think a turbo would be easier just because there is more support for it. Doesnt mean you shouldnt do it thought, it would be very interesting

I guess that a turbo kit is way too expensive when you compare it to the charger. And the turbo has lag, high EGTs, short usable rpm band..
Those are my main reasons to center in the charger instead.
That and the fact that my car keeps its NA nature, because the delivery of the extra power is constant and not in bumps. dont you agree?
Cheers

Supercharger MOD

Supercharger MOD

Re: Supercharger MOD

Re: Supercharger MOD

Re: Supercharger MOD

Re: Supercharger MOD

Re: Supercharger MOD

Re: Supercharger MOD

Re: Supercharger MOD

Re: Supercharger MOD

Re: Supercharger MOD