The mini-me project. Head swap

User avatar
mynameisowen
Posts: 1307
Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 3:38 am
Location: London or Oxford, England
Contact:

Re: The mini-me project. Head swap

Post by mynameisowen »

wow nick keep us posted mate
1996 EJ9 Civic
1998 BB8 Prelude Motegi VTi
1998, B16A2 EK4 Civic VTi

Aims:
EJ9 - Now my GF's car.
BB8 - Rebuild after crash damage to front end.
EK4 - Daily driver. Strip and track prep once prelude project complete

User avatar
Dodo Bizar
Site Admin
Posts: 2009
Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2009 10:36 pm

Re: The mini-me project. Head swap

Post by Dodo Bizar »

Very nice Nick! I believe in the UK a company is providing those harnasses btw, but it was for really high prices. Have to look it up, somewere in my hotmail...

User avatar
BETEK
Posts: 1213
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 10:09 am

Re: The mini-me project. Head swap

Post by BETEK »

It is possible to swap a head from d16a9 (zc) into d14a3.

hondaNickx
Posts: 713
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 1:06 am
Location: Belgium

Re: The mini-me project. Head swap

Post by hondaNickx »

BETEK wrote:It is possible to swap a head from d16a9 (zc) into d14a3.

Yes But ... too much sealing issues and not worth it .The head of the D16a9 has actually bad intake ports.
Quote from Endyn:"The combustion chamber is a better shape than the DOHC.So don't chunk those 1.6 SOHC engines, they can make really good power. For a pure performance application, regardless of application, I'd choose the SOHC. No bull!"

antc_uk
Posts: 14
Joined: Tue Feb 16, 2010 12:06 pm

Re: The mini-me project. Head swap

Post by antc_uk »

So, if I was to swap a Y8 head onto the D14A4 and get the Y8 Cam reground by Bisi would I need a Z6 Dizzy to make it work with OBD1 - so I would need to change my rocker arm assembly too?

OR.... could I use the Y8 Dizzy?


In my mind at present the Y8 head would be the best option for the D14 given the greater resulting CR and the smaller ports for faster flow as opposed to the Z6 head optimised for greater flow for high lift cams that are most effective in the D16 motors (please correct me if this is crap!)

Failing this how effective would a milled Z6 head be?

User avatar
ilya
Posts: 565
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 1:27 pm
Location: Russia
Contact:

Re: The mini-me project. Head swap

Post by ilya »

I think, "why is everyone so looking connectors OBD1 (2)"? Why not just unsolder from the ECU connectors and do not put any? which is at hand, any car. why should we look for. I think that there are people with straight arms, a clever head and knowing how to work with tools.
TNX for Mini-ME
viewtopic.php?f=7&t=359 how2swap IM
EJ9 Russian Helper http://www.ej9.ru
Full Scheme SFI-OBD1 PDF [ENG]
SofRom 1.15 R2 - Chippest RTP Emulator like Hondata S300 and Moates Ostrich

User avatar
Dodo Bizar
Site Admin
Posts: 2009
Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2009 10:36 pm

Re: The mini-me project. Head swap

Post by Dodo Bizar »

I think error searching is at hand. Especially when I first started out I wanted to be able to re-trace all my doings and un-doings. Just unsoldering everything would have blocked any options of returning to stock. Not that I ever went back to stock, but just in case.

Law_
Posts: 1154
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 3:37 pm
Location: Portugal

Re: The mini-me project. Head swap

Post by Law_ »

antc_uk wrote:So, if I was to swap a Y8 head onto the D14A4 and get the Y8 Cam reground by Bisi would I need a Z6 Dizzy to make it work with OBD1 - so I would need to change my rocker arm assembly too?

OR.... could I use the Y8 Dizzy?


In my mind at present the Y8 head would be the best option for the D14 given the greater resulting CR and the smaller ports for faster flow as opposed to the Z6 head optimised for greater flow for high lift cams that are most effective in the D16 motors (please correct me if this is crap!)

Failing this how effective would a milled Z6 head be?
you can use Y8 dizzy with y8 head.

User avatar
novaksaotome
Posts: 79
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 11:27 pm
Location: FRANCE

Re: The mini-me project. Head swap

Post by novaksaotome »

this might sound crazy, but i've read the mini -me topics and Joris doesnt mention anything about wiring the vtec solenoid and stuff, forgot maybe, but i dont think it actually works if you don't send any signal to it... let me know if i'm wrong!

User avatar
Dodo Bizar
Site Admin
Posts: 2009
Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2009 10:36 pm

Re: The mini-me project. Head swap

Post by Dodo Bizar »

You are wrong :mrgreen: . I re-read all my articles and indeed I forgot to mention it. Thanks for pointing this out, I'll correct it in the coming weeks. I only touch on the subject in the OBD1 pinout article.

But here is the deal:

When no power is supplied to the VTEC solenoid the valve is closed, no oil is passed through the VTEC drums inside the rocker arms and no VTEC is engaged. Meaning the rockers are running on its lower non-VTEC lobes.

Now by connecting the VTS pin from the ECU to the 1-wire connector the ECU can send power to the VTEC solenoid. So to engage VTEC around 4 to 6k rpm depending on your configuration. This is required to have VTEC work. What it does is sent oil to the for mentioned drums, interlocking all rockerarms (so the lost motion arms are locked) and forces the rockers to move with the higher VTEC lobe.

There is a secondary thing going on. On some VTEC solenoids there is a oil pressure sensor as well. This will have a 2-wire connector, green. Those two wires are VTM (or VTPS) on the ECU and a ground signal originating from SG2 if you want to do it properly.

Now there are 4 options:
1: Your solenoid has the pressure switch, the ECU expects a pressure switch. Normal for most OBD1 cars, just connect as above.

2: Your solenoid has no pressure switch, the ECU does not expect it. Normal for most OBD2 cars, no connections possible or needed.

3: Hybrid setup: your solenoid has de pressure switch, but the ECU does not expect it. No connections possible, leave the pressure switch unconnected.

4: Hybrid setup which is very common: your solenoid has no pressure switch, but the ECU expects it! Happens when you have D16Y8 head combined with P28 ECU as in my setup. In this case we can't connect the pressure switch since it is not there. To fool the ECU you connect a split from the properly connected VTS signal towards the VTM (or VTPS) on the ECU. This setup only once triggered an error code in my case, but is 99.9% failsafe. Right after engagement the ECU puts 12V on VTS. then it starts measuring for the oil pressure signal... hey what do you know, it sees 12V! So it is ok it thinks. There is a nicer solution: which is switching of the VTEC pressure switch error code in the ECU which most ECU software is able to do.

I'll append my articles with this soon, thanks for noting!

Post Reply